Court Challenge to Referendum Result

As you are aware the recent referendum on Children’s Rights was passed by the people, it is now part of Bunreacht na hÉireann.

However, the validity of the referendum result is being challenged in the courts and has been the subject of broad discussion among individuals and groups concerned with the issue of democracy.

On 19th November a challenge was initiated by Brophy Solicitors in Dublin, on behalf of clients who claim that the Government’s promotion of a YES vote amounted to wrongful conduct that materially affected the outcome of the referendum”.

During the referendum debate Mark McCrystal took a case to the Supreme Court seeking judgement that Government spending to promote a YES vote amounted to an illegal use of public funds – because they were not wholly impartial.  This challenge was based on the 1995 Supreme Court judgment in the McKenna case requiring referendums to be explained to the public in an impartial manner.

Just days before the referendum itself the Supreme Court ruled that “extensive passages” of the Government’s information leaflets and campaign material were biased towards a YES vote.  The Supreme Court ruled that the government had “acted wrongfully” in spending money on a website which was “not fair, equal or impartial”.

So, was democracy served in this referendum?

The Supreme Court has stated that the Government did not act fairly or impartially in conducting the referendum …  so is the result safe and valid?  Is the result the freely expressed will of the people?

The McKenna judgement in 1995, the Crotty judgement of 1987, the re-run of several referendums since and now the Government’s handling of the Children’s Referendum all raise serious questions about our democracy.

Is our right to vote valid only when we “get it right”, do we need to be instructed on how to vote … consider on top of that recent statements on the status of election promises by Government ministers!

BROPHY SOLICITORS have asked that anyone believing their vote, either for, against or abstention was influenced by the Governments dishonesty in the referendum to contact them directly.  The solicitors are looking for people to make statements and possibly later go before the court as witness, if that is required.

This is a link to a letter Brophy Solicitors addressed to Kathy Sinnott, please review if you have an interest in this question.

Share this post

PinIt

10 thoughts on “Court Challenge to Referendum Result

  1. minecraft

    I like the valuable information you provide in your articles.
    I will bookmark your blog and check again here
    regularly. I am quite sure I’ll learn lots of new stuff right
    here! Best of luck for the next!

    Reply
  2. minecraft

    Hi there very cool blog!! Man .. Beautiful .. Superb ..
    I’ll bookmark your site and take the feeds additionally?
    I’m glad to find numerous useful info here in the post, we want develop more
    strategies on this regard, thanks for sharing.
    . . . . .

    Reply
  3. tinder dating site

    I do believe all the ideas you’ve introduced for your post.
    They’re very convincing and can definitely work. Nonetheless, the posts are very quick for
    beginners. May just you please extend them a bit from next
    time? Thank you for the post.

    Reply
  4. descargar facebook

    I am really impressed with your writing skills and also
    with the format for your blog. Is this a paid topic or did
    you customize it yourself? Either way keep up the excellent quality writing, it is uncommon to see a great weblog like this
    one nowadays..

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

11 − ten =